| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:20:00 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I've tried to upgrade to BL2, and found it is masked, along with |
| 5 |
>> openrc...so if those were masked..how did I end up with bits that rely |
| 6 |
>> on it, without unmasking them? strange. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Very strange. Baselayout-2 and openrc are both keyword masked and |
| 10 |
> shouldn't be installed on a stable system. Which bits of |
| 11 |
> testing/bl2/openrc have you ended up with? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I would appear that its part of lvm and/or mdadm...but I just don't |
| 16 |
know. Everything about BL2 is so hazy, its hard to tell. Basically I |
| 17 |
have a crapped up system and I have a presentation tomorrow :P |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
So I'm in the process of a partial over the top install. Once it's |
| 20 |
settled in, using the old portage tree that I know and love, I will be |
| 21 |
very wary about any upgrades...and I may just leave it as it is. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I don't see how BL2 has affected me, for as you say it's all masked. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Would be nice if a portage sync alerted me to the fact that the devil is |
| 26 |
now in control of the tree, and my system is likely to die at the |
| 27 |
slightest emerge. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I guess the old adage is true, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. So I |
| 30 |
won't be upgrading anything on my systems until this is a bit clearer. |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives