| 1 |
> Alan, |
| 2 |
> Seems reasonable. Would I (Could I?) then do an equery depends on |
| 3 |
> each binary and assuming nothing depends on it remove them by hand |
| 4 |
> without causing damage? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I'd want to do another revdep-rebuild every so often to ensure that |
| 7 |
> things remained consistent. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Makes sense to me - doing the equery on the package that installed the |
| 12 |
binary (which may have a name unrelated). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
IIUC, there are two tools useful for second/third opinions for this task; |
| 15 |
dep and pquery. Here's an example of their use on fftw: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
dep -L fftw |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
pquery --vdb --revdep sci-libs/fftw |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
And as you idicated, do a revdep-rebuild after the manual deletion. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives