1 |
On 2/19/07, Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday 19 February 2007, Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
> > Hi, |
4 |
> > I'm not clear why revdep-rebuild is showing lots of broken |
5 |
> > linkages but then telling me everything is in order and there is no |
6 |
> > work to do to clean up the system. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > I haven't seen this before. What's causing it? |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > What's the process to get this cleaned up and down to no messages |
11 |
> > about broken things? |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Thanks, |
14 |
> > Mark |
15 |
> |
16 |
> My guess would be that portage cannot assign the broken binaries |
17 |
> (/usr/bin/avibench etc) to an ebuild, and therefore there cannot be |
18 |
> anything to emerge. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> They might be orphan binaries from a previous incomplete unmerge, or |
21 |
> something locally compiled, or even files installed from a foreign |
22 |
> package system (.tgz or .rpm perhaps?) |
23 |
> |
24 |
> alan |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
Alan, |
29 |
Seems reasonable. Would I (Could I?) then do an equery depends on |
30 |
each binary and assuming nothing depends on it remove them by hand |
31 |
without causing damage? |
32 |
|
33 |
I'd want to do another revdep-rebuild every so often to ensure that |
34 |
things remained consistent. |
35 |
|
36 |
Thanks, |
37 |
Mark |
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |