| 1 |
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:43 PM, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> hydra <hydrapolic@×××××.com> writes: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:20 PM, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> >> symack <symack@×××××.com> writes: |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> Other than that, unless you really do need full virtualization: I'm |
| 10 |
> >> finding Linux containers to be far more manageable than virtual |
| 11 |
> >> machines, and much more efficient. |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> |
| 14 |
> > Can you please post some more details? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> About containers? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> There's very useful documentation about them like |
| 19 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/LXC ... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> What can I say? Virtualization with xen is like juggling with a set of |
| 22 |
> black boxes each of which aren't exactly accessible; the |
| 23 |
> documentation sucks, it's hard work to get it running and likewise hard |
| 24 |
> to maintain. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Virtualization with containers is basically as simple as running just |
| 27 |
> another daemon. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Which the "better" tool, or combination of tools is, depends on what you |
| 30 |
> want to accomplish. You could use containers in a VM, too, or use |
| 31 |
> virtualbox along with containers to run the odd VMs that require full |
| 32 |
> virtualzation. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that daemons |
| 37 |
> might swallow us. Finally, this fear has become reasonable. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
You mean the documentation at Gentoo about Xen sucks or the upstream |
| 41 |
documentation? What information are you missing from there? Maybe we can |
| 42 |
add the missing pieces for Xen being more accessible and easier to use, |
| 43 |
what do you think? :) |
Archives