| 1 |
hydra <hydrapolic@×××××.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:20 PM, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> symack <symack@×××××.com> writes: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Other than that, unless you really do need full virtualization: I'm |
| 8 |
>> finding Linux containers to be far more manageable than virtual |
| 9 |
>> machines, and much more efficient. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> Can you please post some more details? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
About containers? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
There's very useful documentation about them like |
| 17 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/LXC ... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
What can I say? Virtualization with xen is like juggling with a set of |
| 20 |
black boxes each of which aren't exactly accessible; the |
| 21 |
documentation sucks, it's hard work to get it running and likewise hard |
| 22 |
to maintain. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Virtualization with containers is basically as simple as running just |
| 25 |
another daemon. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Which the "better" tool, or combination of tools is, depends on what you |
| 28 |
want to accomplish. You could use containers in a VM, too, or use |
| 29 |
virtualbox along with containers to run the odd VMs that require full |
| 30 |
virtualzation. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that daemons |
| 35 |
might swallow us. Finally, this fear has become reasonable. |
Archives