| 1 |
On Dienstag, 12. August 2008, b.n. wrote: |
| 2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann ha scritto: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >> So I can rephrase my question as those two: |
| 5 |
> >> Why didn't those projects use the Linux kernel? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > because they wanted to do something different. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Yes, very probably. However it's a kind of decision I don't really |
| 10 |
> understand... using a Linux or BSD as the underlying kernel would give |
| 11 |
> you immediately tons of drivers and stuff, even if you want to rewrite |
| 12 |
> most of other utilities from scratch. |
| 13 |
> Probably I don't get it because I'm not an OS programmer geek. :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
some people build their own bikes or boats despite the fact that you can |
| 16 |
choose between tons of bikes and boats. ;) |
Archives