| 1 |
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Damian <damian.only@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Arttu V. <arttuv69@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 3/10/10, Damian <damian.only@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs: |
| 5 |
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302196 |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> It's been unresolved for quite a long time now, so I was wondering if |
| 8 |
>>> somebody could give me a hint on how to solve this problem. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Are you still using lzma-utils, or have you moved on to xz-utils? |
| 11 |
> I'm using app-arch/xz-utils. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>> Which package owns your /usr/lib64/liblzmadec.*? (equery belongs |
| 14 |
>> foofile on Gentoo, dunno what is the equivalent on paludis) |
| 15 |
> Acording to the output of `paludis --owner /usr/lib64/liblzmadec.la` |
| 16 |
> no package is the owner. I'm really lost right now... |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
This happens when an ebuild doesn't remove packages as well as it installs them. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
revdep-rebuild should be telling you that the machine is clean except |
| 23 |
there are these extra files like /usr/lib64/liblzmadec.la. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
equery belongs /usr/lib64/liblzmadec.la |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
tells you nothing owns it which means the original package isn't on |
| 28 |
the system anymore. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Since we think /usr/lib64/liblzmadec.la comes from lzma-utils we would use |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
equiery files lzma-utils |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
to determine whether this package provides it. I cannot do that as I |
| 35 |
don't have lzma-utils on my systems anymore. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
If you don't have lzma-utils on your system anymore then erase |
| 38 |
/usr/lib64/liblzmadec.la by hand and run revdep-rebuild -ip again and |
| 39 |
see if it's clean. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Hope this helps, |
| 42 |
Mark |
Archives