Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Sergey Kobzar <tod.zullu@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-user] Is 2008.0_beta2 stable enough?
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 08:38:55
Message-Id: 183222100.20080522113852@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is 2008.0_beta2 stable enough? by Neil Bothwick
1 Thursday, May 22, 2008, 11:27:31 AM, Neil wrote:
2
3 > On Thu, 22 May 2008 11:18:43 +0300, Sergey Kobzar wrote:
4
5 >> I have a new laptop and want install Gentoo on it but not sure which
6 >> profile to use. Is 2008.0 beta 2 stable enough for desktop or I should
7 >> still use 2007?
8
9 > I've been running with 2008.0/desktop profiles for a few weeks with no
10 > problems,
11
12 but then you switched back to 2007?
13
14
15 > but a profile isn't much more than a collection of USE flags, so
16 > installing with 2007.0 and switching later is simple.
17
18 I'm agree with you, but it may require recompiling mostly all
19 installed software. Well, it's not a really big problem anyway.
20
21 I'd want to use 2008 beta2 if it's stable enough.
22
23
24 > A more important
25 > question is whether you want to run a stable or testing arch. From your
26 > question, I'd say you should run stable; ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=x96 or amd64.
27
28 Yes, it's correct (x86 maybe?).
29
30
31 --
32 Sergey
33
34 --
35 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Is 2008.0_beta2 stable enough? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>