Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Network failed and weird error message
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 19:40:24
Message-Id: 524F1885.7050806@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Network failed and weird error message by Dale
1 On 04/10/2013 18:09, Dale wrote:
2 > Sometime last night while I was sleeping, my network sort of hiccuped.
3 > If I went to a Konsole, I could ping google so it appears the network
4 > was working on the lower level but not one browser that was left open
5 > would work. It also didn't/couldn't download new emails. When I
6 > restarted the browser, it worked. This is the case for both Seaminkey
7 > and Firefox. If it was just one, I'd think browser issue but not two of
8 > them at the same time. This is a example of what is in my messages file:
9 >
10 > Sep 29 03:10:15 localhost kernel: [382175.585718] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
11 > urb ffff88034092b0c0 path 1 ep1in 93120000 cc 9 --> status -121
12 > Sep 29 03:10:17 localhost kernel: [382177.582033] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
13 > urb ffff8803f06a9d40 path 1 ep1in 92120000 cc 9 --> status -121
14 > Sep 29 03:10:19 localhost kernel: [382179.586285] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
15 > urb ffff8803f06a9680 path 1 ep1in 93120000 cc 9 --> status -121
16 > Sep 29 03:10:21 localhost kernel: [382181.582602] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
17 > urb ffff8803f06a9680 path 1 ep1in 92120000 cc 9 --> status -121
18 > Sep 29 03:10:23 localhost kernel: [382183.586879] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
19 > urb ffff8803f06a9680 path 1 ep1in 93120000 cc 9 --> status -121
20
21
22
23 What I read from your description is that Seamonkey and Firefox hiccuped
24 and everything else either works or was not tested. Assuming that those
25 browsers share lots of common code - see where I'm going with this?
26
27 The entries in your messages file may or may not be relevant, and if
28 they are relevant it will be as a side effect.
29
30 OHCI is a USB 1.1 implementation, I can't imagine why you have it
31 loaded. Surely you do not have USB 1 only hardware? USB2 deals with that
32 nicely. It is possible that you have a shit storm of USB weirdness going
33 on and this in locking up the desktop. Try disabling USB stuff you don't
34 need and see what gives.
35
36
37
38 >
39 > I did a google search but obviously not direct hits so I had to adjust
40 > things until I got some hits. I removed for example the time stamp and
41 > lots of other unigue things to my system. The closest hit I got was
42 > three years ago and it's not the same even allowing for the stuff that
43 > will change. So, google was no help.
44 >
45 > I did a update last night. It updated the kernel sources but I haven't
46 > touched it yet. It updated the virtual for udev and nvidia-drivers
47 > which I am using at the moment. The only one I see that could possibly
48 > affect this is the udev one but I don't think it is likely since it is a
49 > virtual and the actual dev package didn't change.
50 >
51 > By the way, I use checkrestart after updates. If needed, I go to boot
52 > runlevel and restart whatever else is needed to get a clean output. I
53 > did rmmod nvidia and modprobe nvidia last night. I'm hoping this driver
54 > will not cause my kicker thingy to lock up like the last dozen or so
55 > has. :/
56 >
57 > Keep in mind, the network worked in a Konsole. It appears to me it was
58 > KDE and/or things running inside of KDE and a regular user that had
59 > issues. I only checked my Seamonkey and Firefox and they did not work
60 > until they was restarted. My grand fix was to log out and log back in
61 > again.
62 >
63 > I just checked again, I am still getting the errors above even tho the
64 > browsers are working. The error above may not be related to this. Sort
65 > of confusing at the moment.
66 >
67 > Kernel problem? KDE problem? Some USB error? Something else? Thoughts?
68 >
69 > Dale
70 >
71 > :-) :-)
72 >
73 > P. S. This is what I get while restarting my network service:
74 >
75 > Oct 4 10:27:13 localhost kernel: [839575.429674] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
76 > urb ffff8802f06dc240 path 1 ep1in 93120000 cc 9 --> status -121
77 > Oct 4 10:27:15 localhost kernel: [839577.425964] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
78 > urb ffff8802f06dc240 path 1 ep1in 92120000 cc 9 --> status -121
79 > Oct 4 10:27:17 localhost kernel: [839579.430267] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
80 > urb ffff8802f06dc6c0 path 1 ep1in 93120000 cc 9 --> status -121
81 > Oct 4 10:27:17 localhost sshd[8316]: Received signal 15; terminating.
82 > Oct 4 10:27:17 localhost kernel: [839580.289194] r8169 0000:03:00.0
83 > eth0: link down
84 > Oct 4 10:27:17 localhost kernel: [839580.289204] r8169 0000:03:00.0
85 > eth0: link down
86 > Oct 4 10:27:17 localhost kernel: [839580.289256] IPv6:
87 > ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
88 > Oct 4 10:27:18 localhost sshd[8692]: Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22.
89 > Oct 4 10:27:18 localhost sshd[8692]: Server listening on :: port 22.
90 > Oct 4 10:27:19 localhost kernel: [839581.426532] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
91 > urb ffff88042086ac00 path 1 ep1in 92120000 cc 9 --> status -121
92 > Oct 4 10:27:19 localhost kernel: [839582.327590] r8169 0000:03:00.0
93 > eth0: link up
94 > Oct 4 10:27:19 localhost kernel: [839582.327599] IPv6:
95 > ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
96 > Oct 4 10:27:21 localhost kernel: [839583.430811] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
97 > urb ffff8802f06dc6c0 path 1 ep1in 93120000 cc 9 --> status -121
98 > Oct 4 10:27:22 localhost kernel: [839584.527264] r8169 0000:03:00.0
99 > eth0: link down
100 > Oct 4 10:27:23 localhost kernel: [839585.427127] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
101 > urb ffff880410612900 path 1 ep1in 92120000 cc 9 --> status -121
102 > Oct 4 10:27:23 localhost kernel: [839586.105999] r8169 0000:03:00.0
103 > eth0: link up
104 > Oct 4 10:27:25 localhost kernel: [839587.431380] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
105 > urb ffff880410612900 path 1 ep1in 93120000 cc 9 --> status -121
106 > Oct 4 10:27:27 localhost kernel: [839589.427672] ohci_hcd 0000:00:12.1:
107 > urb ffff880410612900 path 1 ep1in 92120000 cc 9 --> status -121
108 >
109 > I'm thinking the error is not related to network since on e of them is
110 > while the network was down. I'm glad that logrotate is working well. O_O
111 >
112
113
114 --
115 Alan McKinnon
116 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Network failed and weird error message Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Network failed and weird error message Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>