| 1 |
Am 29.03.2013 19:51, schrieb Mick: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> ifconfig should show a new device has been activated. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Yes? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
see below ... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
>> When I rmmod them all and plug in again, I get "option" loaded |
| 10 |
>> again. Should I remove this one from my .config? |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Even when I rmmod option, modprobe qmi_wwan and then plugin |
| 13 |
>> "option" gets loaded (and no "mobile broadband" in NM). |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I would get NM troubleshooted after the device is recognised by the |
| 16 |
> kernel and the relevant modules are loaded. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
>> Could it be related to our friend systemd which renames "wwan0" |
| 20 |
>> to "wwp0s26u1u1i1" according to dmesg? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I thought that this is a udev issue, rather than systemd. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Sure, udev. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I don't know |
| 28 |
> anything about systemd (not tried it yet) and on a stable Gentoo |
| 29 |
> install you should be able to see the wwan0 device in ifconfig. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I get no wwan0 but this: |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
# ifconfig wwp0s26u1u2i1 |
| 34 |
wwp0s26u1u2i1: flags=4098<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 |
| 35 |
ether 0c:5b:8f:27:9a:64 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) |
| 36 |
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) |
| 37 |
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 |
| 38 |
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) |
| 39 |
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Just read the posting by Diego Petteno on this issue: |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2013/03/predictably-non-persistent-names |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
> PS. I should also say that I don't use NM on my machines ... so |
| 46 |
> someone else should hopefully be able to help with NM issues. I |
| 47 |
> use symlinks in /etc/init.d/ for my NICs. |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
NM sometimes is very comfortable on notebooks etc. ... so why not ... |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
I don't know if NM *should* detect that fuzzy interface-name now ... |
| 52 |
maybe I should do some udev-rule to get wwan0 back? At least for a test. |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Stefan |
Archives