From: | James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd | ||
Date: | Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:48:23 | ||
Message-Id: | loom.20141216T204440-672@post.gmane.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd by Harry Putnam |
1 | Harry Putnam <reader <at> newsguy.com> writes: |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | > James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes: |
5 | > > lxde is deprecated, imho. [1] |
6 | > > lxqt is the future of that lineage [2] |
7 | > Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to |
8 | > the question. |
9 | |
10 | |
11 | OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions on lxde, which |
12 | I am still using? I have lots of breakage on lxde; I do not bother |
13 | fixing. I'm working on migrating to lxqt. Good luck with lxde. |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | James |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd | Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> |
[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd | Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> |