| 1 |
Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> FUD again. The backwards compability is still all there and udev can be |
| 3 |
> built standalone and ran standalone. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Sorry I'm going to call "bullshit" on this one. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You know damn well "upstream" moved udev into systemd, promising everyone it would |
| 8 |
be possible to continue to build just udev, and then changed that with weasel words |
| 9 |
into "build everything and extract udev". |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
So you cannot "build udev standalone" any more, as you state. You have to build systemd |
| 12 |
and then extract the udev stuff you actually want. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
You don't like other projects bundling dependencies, but somehow it's ok for systemd. |
| 15 |
Utter tripe. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> And on the contrary, there was no need for sys-fs/eudev to remove |
| 18 |
> support for sys-fs/systemd when it could have supported both |
| 19 |
> sys-apps/systemd and sys-apps/openrc like sys-fs/udev does without issues. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Huh? WTF would be the point, when systemd bundles udev? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
We already have loads of people on the forums having issues with conflicts between |
| 24 |
sys-apps/systemd and sys-fs/udev, so again your point is total nonsense. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
None of which detracts from for your sterling work on Gentoo, and the support you provide |
| 27 |
to users on various media. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |
Archives