1 |
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:36 AM, Grant Edwards |
2 |
<grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On 2018-04-19, Klaus Ethgen <Klaus+gentoo@××××××.de> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> I use light background and many colors of emerge and other tools are |
6 |
>> simple unreadable (like light green). |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Yep, it's awful. People have been complaining about it for years and |
9 |
> years. |
10 |
> |
11 |
>> I searched how to adapt them to my background but did not success. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> The short answer is: you can't. The devs use black backgrounds and |
14 |
> you're supposed to also. |
15 |
> |
16 |
>> I already know about color.map but this just allows to tune some |
17 |
>> colors and not all (at least the ones that are documented in the man |
18 |
>> page). |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> So, is there any way (without using --nocolor) to use color set that is |
21 |
>> more readable? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Nope. |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
You need to find a light color theme that works well. You should edit |
27 |
your .Xdefaults (older documentation references .Xresources, which |
28 |
does not seem to be parsed by some modern utilities or X11 servers) to |
29 |
use that colorscheme. See the "export" tab on https://terminal.sexy/. |
30 |
|
31 |
Pretty much every terminal should honor .Xdefaults, but if not, you |
32 |
will need to change the colors in a menu. |
33 |
|
34 |
If portage uses 256-color codes to specify an absolute color then that |
35 |
should be changed, it makes the program unthemable via the standard |
36 |
interface. It would also be an issue if portage used the less common |
37 |
RGB color escapes. |
38 |
|
39 |
Cheers, |
40 |
R0b0t1 |