1 |
On Friday 14 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote: |
2 |
> That's the way I did it before, you know... but it really comes to be |
3 |
> a pain in the ass when you want to test some new supercool releases |
4 |
> with tons of dependencies, such as kde-4 and so on. |
5 |
|
6 |
Tell me about it, been there done that, I feel your pain :-) |
7 |
|
8 |
> However that's some neat tip, I haven't though on the possibility of |
9 |
> leaving just package.keywords, I'm giving it a try just right now! |
10 |
> Thanks a lot! |
11 |
|
12 |
It was just an idea that came to me, completely untested. Let us know if |
13 |
it mostly works out. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
> |
18 |
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Alan McKinnon |
19 |
<alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
20 |
> > On Friday 14 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote: |
21 |
> > > Hi there. |
22 |
> > > |
23 |
> > > I have a "stable" system (I don't have ~x86 set), but I like to |
24 |
> > > have the latest versions of some specific software (kde, gnome, |
25 |
> > > amarok, alsa, pulseaudio, wine and so on). To achieve that, I've |
26 |
> > > been using autounmask with the parameter -n. When I have a |
27 |
> > > package I want to keep in the latest version, I just autounmask |
28 |
> > > -n package, so all the dependencies are unmasked and no version |
29 |
> > > number is appended. |
30 |
> > > |
31 |
> > > That works fine, but I like to have the latest released |
32 |
> > > versions, which means I usually want to get away from the *9999 |
33 |
> > > ebuilds. The trouble is, when I use autounmask without version |
34 |
> > > numbers, those 9999 packages usually are choosen by portage, for |
35 |
> > > being the effective latest ones. |
36 |
> > > |
37 |
> > > I would like to know if there is a way for me to unmask |
38 |
> > > (automatically if possible) all versions BUT the 9999 ones, so I |
39 |
> > > have the latest releases but the less CVS/Beta packages as |
40 |
> > > possible. |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > I find autounmask does way too much for me, and does it blindly |
43 |
> > just like a dumb computer should. so I do it manually. However, you |
44 |
> > are using -n and at the same time trying to use it without -n... |
45 |
> > |
46 |
> > Trying deleting the autounmask files in |
47 |
> > /etc/portage/package.unmask/, that should go a long way to removing |
48 |
> > the CVS stuff (which is usually hard masked) leaving just |
49 |
> > package.keywords. You might have to manually resolve some conflicts |
50 |
> > now and then though - small price |
51 |
> > |
52 |
> > |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> > -- |
55 |
> > Alan McKinnon |
56 |
> > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
57 |
> > |
58 |
> > -- |
59 |
> > gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
60 |
> |
61 |
> -- |
62 |
> Gustavo Campos |
63 |
> |
64 |
> Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG |
65 |
|
66 |
|
67 |
|
68 |
-- |
69 |
Alan McKinnon |
70 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
71 |
|
72 |
-- |
73 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |