Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Gustavo Campos <gucampos@××××××××.br>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:02:00
Message-Id: 19834d100803140601k4f04cc6cjc6f0bd296aa0cdbe@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999 by Alan McKinnon
1 That's the way I did it before, you know... but it really comes to be
2 a pain in the ass when you want to test some new supercool releases
3 with tons of dependencies, such as kde-4 and so on.
4
5 However that's some neat tip, I haven't though on the possibility of
6 leaving just package.keywords, I'm giving it a try just right now!
7 Thanks a lot!
8
9 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
10 >
11 > On Friday 14 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote:
12 > > Hi there.
13 > >
14 > > I have a "stable" system (I don't have ~x86 set), but I like to have
15 > > the latest versions of some specific software (kde, gnome, amarok,
16 > > alsa, pulseaudio, wine and so on). To achieve that, I've been using
17 > > autounmask with the parameter -n. When I have a package I want to
18 > > keep in the latest version, I just autounmask -n package, so all the
19 > > dependencies are unmasked and no version number is appended.
20 > >
21 > > That works fine, but I like to have the latest released versions,
22 > > which means I usually want to get away from the *9999 ebuilds. The
23 > > trouble is, when I use autounmask without version numbers, those 9999
24 > > packages usually are choosen by portage, for being the effective
25 > > latest ones.
26 > >
27 > > I would like to know if there is a way for me to unmask
28 > > (automatically if possible) all versions BUT the 9999 ones, so I have
29 > > the latest releases but the less CVS/Beta packages as possible.
30 >
31 > I find autounmask does way too much for me, and does it blindly just
32 > like a dumb computer should. so I do it manually. However, you are
33 > using -n and at the same time trying to use it without -n...
34 >
35 > Trying deleting the autounmask files in /etc/portage/package.unmask/,
36 > that should go a long way to removing the CVS stuff (which is usually
37 > hard masked) leaving just package.keywords. You might have to manually
38 > resolve some conflicts now and then though - small price
39 >
40 >
41 >
42 > --
43 > Alan McKinnon
44 > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
45 >
46 > --
47 > gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list
48 >
49 >
50
51
52
53 --
54 Gustavo Campos
55
56 Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG
57 --
58 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Accept all versions but 9999 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>