Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Hartmut Figge <h.figge@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles?
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:52:58
Message-Id: b94557ca-77db-7332-2a47-9eda7d636da9@hfigge.myfqdn.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles? by Hartmut Figge
1 Hartmut Figge:
2
3 >Current status: Emerging (181 of 262) :)
4
5 Current status unknown because of
6 ERROR: dev-cpp/cairomm-1.12.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase):
7 emake failed
8
9 Interesting that a test with 'emerge -q cairomm' failed whereas 'emerge
10 -q -uDN cairomm' succeeded.
11
12 After over 200 packages were emerged it may be time to try a depclean.
13
14 >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
15
16 virtual/pam
17 selected: 0-r1
18 protected: none
19 omitted: none
20
21 :)
22
23 -----
24
25 Still the problem with preserved-rebuild. 'emerge -q @preserved-rebuild'
26 failed but 'emerge -q -uDN @preserved-rebuild' succeeded. Hm.
27
28 Hartmut

Replies