1 |
On Monday, 14 October 2019 20:52:41 BST Hartmut Figge wrote: |
2 |
> Hartmut Figge: |
3 |
> >Current status: Emerging (181 of 262) :) |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Current status unknown because of |
6 |
> ERROR: dev-cpp/cairomm-1.12.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase): |
7 |
> emake failed |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Interesting that a test with 'emerge -q cairomm' failed whereas 'emerge |
10 |
> -q -uDN cairomm' succeeded. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> After over 200 packages were emerged it may be time to try a depclean. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged: |
15 |
> virtual/pam |
16 |
> selected: 0-r1 |
17 |
> protected: none |
18 |
> omitted: none |
19 |
> |
20 |
> :) |
21 |
> |
22 |
> ----- |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Still the problem with preserved-rebuild. 'emerge -q @preserved-rebuild' |
25 |
> failed but 'emerge -q -uDN @preserved-rebuild' succeeded. Hm. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Hartmut |
28 |
|
29 |
The '--deep' option should consider a full dependency down the portage tree of |
30 |
packages, rather than only the immediate dependencies. Perhaps something |
31 |
further down needed to be rebuild for emerge to complete successfully. |
32 |
|
33 |
If you really want to go to town with dependencies you could even try: |
34 |
|
35 |
--with-bdeps=y --complete-graph |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Regards, |
39 |
|
40 |
Mick |