Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles?
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:10:30
Message-Id: 3800508.oYC3OXC5pJ@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles? by Hartmut Figge
1 On Monday, 14 October 2019 20:52:41 BST Hartmut Figge wrote:
2 > Hartmut Figge:
3 > >Current status: Emerging (181 of 262) :)
4 >
5 > Current status unknown because of
6 > ERROR: dev-cpp/cairomm-1.12.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase):
7 > emake failed
8 >
9 > Interesting that a test with 'emerge -q cairomm' failed whereas 'emerge
10 > -q -uDN cairomm' succeeded.
11 >
12 > After over 200 packages were emerged it may be time to try a depclean.
13 >
14 > >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
15 > virtual/pam
16 > selected: 0-r1
17 > protected: none
18 > omitted: none
19 >
20 > :)
21 >
22 > -----
23 >
24 > Still the problem with preserved-rebuild. 'emerge -q @preserved-rebuild'
25 > failed but 'emerge -q -uDN @preserved-rebuild' succeeded. Hm.
26 >
27 > Hartmut
28
29 The '--deep' option should consider a full dependency down the portage tree of
30 packages, rather than only the immediate dependencies. Perhaps something
31 further down needed to be rebuild for emerge to complete successfully.
32
33 If you really want to go to town with dependencies you could even try:
34
35 --with-bdeps=y --complete-graph
36
37 --
38 Regards,
39
40 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature