1 |
Le 10/01/2010 22:26, Matt Harrison a écrit : |
2 |
> I say OT because it's my understanding of DKIM that lets me down here, not Gentoo. I'm |
3 |
> just not sure who to ask or even if it could be something Gentoo related. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I've recently updated my postfix home mail server to use amavis-new for virus and spam |
6 |
> filtering rather than procmail/spamassassin. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> It seems to be working well and I've also enabled some other goodies like DKIM signing |
9 |
> and verification. I haven't confirmed signing is working yet, so maybe a side effect |
10 |
> of this email is that someone can confirm this for me ;) |
11 |
|
12 |
Your mail is not DKIM-Signed, check your setup. |
13 |
|
14 |
> The main query I have is that a lot of the mail I get, in this case from various |
15 |
> mailing lists, appears to failed DKIM verification. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> For example, several of the posters on this list are DKIM signing their mail either as |
18 |
> part of gmail policy (or another big provider) or personal intent. Something in the |
19 |
> region of 50% of signed mail on this list contains headers such as: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Authentication-Results: genesis.genestate.com (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail |
22 |
> (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@gmail.com |
23 |
> Authentication-Results: genesis.genestate.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=softfail |
24 |
> (fail, message has been altered) header.from=xxxxxx@×××××.com |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Whereas the rest looks like this: |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Authentication-Results: genesis.genestate.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass |
29 |
> header.i=@gmail.com |
30 |
> Authentication-Results: genesis.genestate.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass |
31 |
> header.from=xxxxxx@×××××.com |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Now I find it unreasonable to assume that 50% of the mail I receive is being actively |
34 |
> tampered with, so it must be something getting twisted out of shape. All I'm trying to |
35 |
> discover is whether it's something at my end that I need to fiddle with. I followed a |
36 |
> few different guides to piece my setup together so it's quite possible I've overlooked |
37 |
> or misconfigured something. |
38 |
|
39 |
90% chance the emails failing DKIM verification had their email subject modified |
40 |
to add "[gentoo-user]" in it by the mlmmj program that manage the mailing-list, |
41 |
which mainly concerns topic starts (ie first mails about one topic). |
42 |
|
43 |
> If anyone knows about DKIM and might be able to shed a light on this, I'd love to |
44 |
> hear. It's not a big problem, just a puzzle I'm interested in. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Thanks |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Matt Harrison |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Xavier Parizet |
52 |
YaGB : http://gentooist.com |
53 |
GPG : C7DC B10E FC21 63BE |
54 |
B453 D239 F6E6 DF65 1569 91BF |