| 1 |
On 2017-11-05 17:17, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Distros will always have to do integration work, and that is fine. |
| 4 |
> That is the role of a distro. And sometimes distros have to roll |
| 5 |
> their own tools when they just aren't available. Once upon a time |
| 6 |
> service managers fell into that category. Now this is less the case. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
What's a service manager? Is making cron care about missed jobs service |
| 9 |
management, but running daily/weekly/monthly jobs isn't? I'd find such |
| 10 |
a distinction quite tenuous. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> There is of course nothing wrong if people want to implement things. |
| 13 |
> I just tend to prefer to stick with stuff that has an upstream that is |
| 14 |
> bigger than one distro. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Well that's another thing. I will tend to agree when upstream is an |
| 17 |
independent project. But here the development seems to be driven 99% by |
| 18 |
RedHat. Look at the ChangeLog. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I know of another project that's bigger than a distro ... now that it |
| 21 |
forced its way into all the others. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
And now I really shut up! |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, |
| 27 |
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. |
| 28 |
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain. |
Archives