1 |
Eliezer Croitoru wrote: |
2 |
> On 18/03/2012 11:52, Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Peter Humphrey wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Saturday 17 March 2012 12:54:53 Eliezer Croitoru wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>>> genkernel is pretty simple to use if you ask me. |
7 |
>>>> just |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>>> emerege genkernel |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> and then use |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> genkerenl --menuconfig all |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>>> it will do everything for you the same as in a regular kernel |
16 |
>>>> compiling. |
17 |
>>>> |
18 |
>>>> you have instructions on how to use genkernel on the handbook. |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>> What's more, you don't have to keep going through menuconfig if you |
21 |
>>> already have a running self-compiled kernel. Just copy the .config |
22 |
>>> file to |
23 |
>>> somewhere safe (I use, e.g. /boot/config-3.2) and call genkernel with |
24 |
>>> the |
25 |
>>> option to specify the config file it's to use. Sorry but I can't tell |
26 |
>>> you |
27 |
>>> exactly what the parameter is as I don't have genkernel on this box. |
28 |
>>> Someone will be along in a moment though. |
29 |
>>> |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> I used genkernel when I was first installing Gentoo. I let that thing |
33 |
>> build half a dozen kernels, chroot in between too. You know what, not |
34 |
>> one of them worked. That was a long time ago but let me check something |
35 |
>> here.< spit spit spit> I had to get the bad taste out of my mouth. |
36 |
>> lol |
37 |
>> |
38 |
>> I might also add, I started using a init thingy a few weeks ago, dracut |
39 |
>> tool. For some crazy reason, when I boot with the init thingy, my |
40 |
>> system doesn't work right. When I boot without the init thingy, it |
41 |
>> works fine. Still trying to figure out that one. It's in another |
42 |
>> thread. |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> I don't see myself using genkernel any time soon. Right now, I'm having |
45 |
>> flashbacks to hal with regard to dracut and the whole init thingy /usr |
46 |
>> mess. |
47 |
> i have used genkernel for a long time and all of my genkernel |
48 |
> compilation works really good. |
49 |
> i have (counting, 1 very very big production server, 2 small production |
50 |
> server, 3 home server, 4 +5 +6 + 7 +8 of vms runing genkernel with |
51 |
> several services such as mail mail filtering web server and monitoring) |
52 |
> so what can i say? all these machines will say other then you. |
53 |
> |
54 |
> Regards, |
55 |
> Eliezer |
56 |
> |
57 |
>> |
58 |
>> Dale |
59 |
>> |
60 |
>> :-) :-) |
61 |
>> |
62 |
|
63 |
Odd, it can work on all those yet fail on a relatively simple system. |
64 |
Makes one wonder. Maybe it is to complicated? Sort of starting to |
65 |
sound like udev isn't it? lol |
66 |
|
67 |
I didn't say it would fail for the OP. I just said it never worked for |
68 |
me. Compiling my own has worked for me. I have only had one failure |
69 |
with that. I might also add, I have read where others have nightmares |
70 |
about genkernel. I'm not the only one. |
71 |
|
72 |
Dale |
73 |
|
74 |
:-) :-) |
75 |
|
76 |
|
77 |
-- |
78 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
79 |
how you interpreted my words! |
80 |
|
81 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
82 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |