| 1 |
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I wouldn't worry about it at all, there is no way *sys-fs/udev ebuild* |
| 5 |
>> will ever need systemd. There might be a news item later, with |
| 6 |
>> instructions on moving to something else, but that's not something we |
| 7 |
>> are even planning at the moment, so sys-fs/udev is still the de facto |
| 8 |
>> proper upstream /dev manager. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> What worries me is that Lennart has been able to get modifications |
| 11 |
> done to the kernel, e.g. kdbus. I know this'll sound paranoid, but how |
| 12 |
> long before he pushes a patch that requires systemd to run the linux |
| 13 |
> kernel? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Then you can take the very last commit to Linus' Git repository before |
| 16 |
that hypothetical change, and fork the Linux kernel into whatever |
| 17 |
direction your crazy heart desires. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Business as usual in the Free Software world. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 24 |
Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias |
| 25 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives