Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ?
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:20:46
Message-Id: 20141111052026.GA2194@waltdnes.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ? by Samuli Suominen
1 On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote
2
3 > I wouldn't worry about it at all, there is no way *sys-fs/udev ebuild*
4 > will ever need systemd. There might be a news item later, with
5 > instructions on moving to something else, but that's not something we
6 > are even planning at the moment, so sys-fs/udev is still the de facto
7 > proper upstream /dev manager.
8
9 What worries me is that Lennart has been able to get modifications
10 done to the kernel, e.g. kdbus. I know this'll sound paranoid, but how
11 long before he pushes a patch that requires systemd to run the linux
12 kernel?
13
14 --
15 Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
16 I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ? Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ? "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ? Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>