| 1 |
On 29/11/2016 14:26, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 28 Nov 2016 20:59:30 Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I'll consider switching to qt5 when I can rebuild _all_ my packages that |
| 5 |
>> way. Under no circumstances will I install both qt4 and qt5, that is a |
| 6 |
>> recipe for madness. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I take it you don't run a KDE desktop with KMail-2. I do, and I found many |
| 9 |
> months ago that it was no longer possible to resist Qt-5. Since then I've been |
| 10 |
> running a sort of hybrid system in which, as Neil said, most components of KDE |
| 11 |
> have been moved to Qt-5 but KMail-2 is still months away. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Madness, while I wouldn't attempt to deny all possibility of it, seems not to |
| 14 |
> be evident here just yet. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I too don't see much wrong with co-installing Qt4 and Qt5. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Different libs, different paths. Only real downside is disk space |
| 21 |
consumed. It's not really much different from having both gth-2 and |
| 22 |
gtk-3, or even gtk and qt |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 26 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives