| 1 |
Hey Mark, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
the news item does not tell the exact version because there might be sub/rc- |
| 4 |
versions until release. so on release date the devs will remove keywords of |
| 5 |
the right versions. i read the dev mailing list a bit and it should be |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
baselayout-2.0.2 + openrc-0.8.2-r1 |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
if no further -rc will be introduced till release. already installed it |
| 10 |
yesterday, followed the migration guide and it works fine for me. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
or just wait until it is offical released and use those versions. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Cheers |
| 16 |
Felix Leif |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:01 Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 21 |
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 22 |
> > On Monday 02 May 2011 10:11:06 Thanasis wrote: |
| 23 |
> >> Let me add that my system defaults to the _stable_ software branch. |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > Thanks for the heads up. :) |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > It seems then that Baselayout2/OpenRC is being rolled out to stable. |
| 28 |
> > I'll be unmasking and updating a couple of boxen today, taking |
| 29 |
> > advantage of some spare time and finishing the rest off next weekend. |
| 30 |
> > |
| 31 |
> > Hope all goes well. |
| 32 |
> > -- |
| 33 |
> > Regards, |
| 34 |
> > Mick |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> How will you / did you decide what versions to unmask? The news |
| 37 |
> message seems quite vague and I see lots of versions of things. Two |
| 38 |
> 2.X versions of baselayout and four versions of OpenRC. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> I'd potentially start updating a stable machine today but I'd prefer |
| 41 |
> to only unmask what is actually going to become the stable version and |
| 42 |
> nothing higher. |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> - Mark |
Archives