Archives
Archives
| From: | Fredrik Tolf <fredrik@×××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Xgl and direct rendering or 'Would you like Xorg or Xgl, sir?' | ||
| Date: | Fri, 19 Jan 2007 02:45:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1169174379.11789.39.camel@pc7.dolda2000.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Xgl and direct rendering or 'Would you like Xorg or Xgl, sir?' by "Jan Stępień" |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 23:47 +0100, Jan Stępień wrote: |
| 2 | > On 18 Sty, 19:50, "Hemmann, Volker Armin" |
| 3 | > <volker.armin.hemm...@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 4 | > > nope. It isn't. |
| 5 | > > Xgl and direct rendering are exclusive. One or the other. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Pity. That would be lovely. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I'm no expert, but as far as I know, that's the reason why AIGLX |
| 10 | succeeded Xgl. So if you ask me, I think AIGLX (if it works with ATI) |
| 11 | would be the solution to your problem. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Fredrik Tolf |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Xgl and direct rendering or 'Would you like Xorg or Xgl, sir?' | "Jan Stępień" <jan@×××××××××××.pl> |