| 1 |
On 05/09/2010 10:37 AM, Rudmer van Dijk wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 09 May 2010, walt wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> This looks to me like a major portage screwup. I see that on my ~amd64 |
| 5 |
>> machine I have both versions of libpng, but the 1.2.43-r1 doesn't install |
| 6 |
>> a pkg-config file because 1.4.2 installs one with the same name, and just |
| 7 |
>> as bad, version 1.2.43-r1 removed the libpng12 header files. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> For now, I'd suggest just going back to to 1.2.40 if you can -- maybe mask |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> >1.2.40 in package.mask? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I should have said 1.2.40 instead of 1.2.43, sorry |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
>> Meanwhile I'm trying to fix firefox so I can read the bug report mentioned |
| 16 |
>> by Andras. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> well I'm getting into a .la hell... |
| 19 |
> you need to rebuild packages which are themselves not invalid and therefore |
| 20 |
> can't be found by revdep-rebuild... |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> searching with "grep png12 `find /usr/lib64/ -name '*.la'`" lists all .la |
| 23 |
^^ |
| 24 |
I think the png12 should be png14 instead. We need to go backwards by re- |
| 25 |
building the packages that have already been linked against libpng-1.4.2 |
| 26 |
(which we are removing until it's fixed). |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> files with a bad png version, rebuilding those will fix the system. after that |
| 29 |
> all packages found by revdep-rebuild can be emerged. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Rudmer |
Archives