1 |
Jonathan Haws <Jonathan.Haws@×××××××.edu> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sunday March 2 2008 16:43, Mark Kirkwood wrote: |
4 |
>> Right - what you intend the backup to protect against drives all this |
5 |
>> sort of stuff. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> The thing that is driving my backups is a hard disk failure. |
8 |
|
9 |
Of course :) |
10 |
|
11 |
> Hence I was |
12 |
> using Ghost instead of something else so I can backup the entire drive and |
13 |
> not just a single partition. That enables the quickest recovery of the |
14 |
> entire system in the event of a failure. |
15 |
|
16 |
Depends. If you'd just store tar files, you'd just have to create the |
17 |
filesystem beforehand and then restore the tar files. Won't take much |
18 |
longer than restoring a Ghost image, I'd suppose. |
19 |
|
20 |
> I have looked everywhere I can think of to find a tool that is similar to |
21 |
> Ghost that will backup the entire hard drive to an image that I can put to |
22 |
> DVD, without including free blocks on the disk (I don't want an 80GB image |
23 |
> of |
24 |
> an 80GB drive when only 5GB are in use at the time). |
25 |
|
26 |
That's why I'd rather use tar... An additional benefit is, that tar |
27 |
is *MUCH* simpler than Ghost (or partimage). Because of that, you could |
28 |
use your tar file in many more applications (for example if you want |
29 |
to have a look at what the file was at your last backup). |
30 |
|
31 |
> Does anyone know of |
32 |
> a tool capable of this that runs on Linux and has FULL Linux fs support? |
33 |
|
34 |
partimage. |
35 |
|
36 |
Michael |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |