| 1 |
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:04:26 +0300 Andrey Gerasimenko <gak@××××××.ru> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Thanks for the threads. My impression is that the way stabilization |
| 4 |
> works should be described in a place of high visibility, at least in |
| 5 |
> the FAQ. I beleive this question will be asked again and again if |
| 6 |
> new users do not see how "stable" is defined early. If they see the |
| 7 |
> definition, no questions will be asked. For example, I do not think |
| 8 |
> that developers waiting for bug reports to stabilize an ebuild is |
| 9 |
> either wrong or correct. It is just a part of the current |
| 10 |
> definition of the term "stable". |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
It is described in gentoo docs: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3&chap=1#doc_chap4 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
See part "Moving package versions from ~ARCH to ARCH". I agree that |
| 17 |
this is perhaps not "a place with high visibility". Maybe it should be |
| 18 |
included into FAQs. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Robert |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Robert Cernansky |
| 25 |
E-mail: hslists2@××××××.sk |
| 26 |
Jabber: HS@××××××.sk |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives