| 1 |
galiza.ceive@×××××.com (Johám-Luís Miguéns Vila) writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> writes: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Attempting to install stumpwm-cvs I run into an emerge failure with on |
| 6 |
>> of the dependencies; dev-lisp/cmucl. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Below is a snippet from the end of the emerge of |
| 9 |
>> dev-lisp/cmucl-l-19d_p2. Can anyone see what might be the problem? |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> [...] |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Hi. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> First of all, It's not encouraged to use stumpwm-cvs ebuild as it's |
| 16 |
> obsolete [1]. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Its probably another bug that that fact is not included in the portage |
| 19 |
desc statement. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> And regarding cmucl build error, there's a bug report on b.g.o. with a |
| 22 |
> patch that seems to fix it [2]. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I've downloaded that but not used it yet. |
| 25 |
But I seem to recall that when you change an ebuild, you can't just |
| 26 |
install it then ... but have to create a new ebuild or some such? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
>> Emacs, n.: |
| 30 |
>> A slow-moving parody of a text editor. |
| 31 |
>> - This message may be digitally signed: GPG KeyID:0x9D2FD6C8 || FNMT SSL |
| 32 |
>> cert |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Damn! |
| 36 |
> Of course, signature statements are not shared by poster... :( |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Gack, you were almost caught in print disparaging the `One True Editor' |
Archives