Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Jeremy Olexa <olexa@××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Compile question
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 03:39:00
Message-Id: 44BB044A.8090803@cs.umn.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Compile question by "Anthony E. Caudel"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
5 > I have an AMD 64x2 with MAKEOPTS set to -j3.
6 >
7 > I have noticed that some compiles (glibc for example) will use the
8 > system to the fullest. top reports %CPU near 0%. Other compiles, such
9 > as openoffice seem to use only half as much cpu time. For this top
10 > reported consistently near 50%.
11 >
12 > So I'm wondering if the openoffice compile used only one of the amd
13 > cores. Do some of the emerges ignore the MAKEOPTS setting? Or is this
14 > an upstream issue with the compile not using threads?
15 >
16 > Tony
17
18 Tony,
19 Some ebuilds filter out MAKEOPTS="-jX" because the makefile(?) is not
20 written correctly to compile with more than one concurrent compile
21 process. According to the OOo ebuild, -jX is not filtered, so that is
22 not the case. Also, you may have checked the CPU usage when it was
23 extracting the tarball, obviously the choke point here would be the HD,
24 not the CPU.
25
26 Just some extra info for you, I am not the ebuild expert. HTH
27
28 - --
29 Jeremy Olexa
30 (olexa@××××××.edu)
31 Office: EE/CS 1-201
32 CS/IT Systems Staff
33 University of Minnesota
34
35 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
37 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
38
39 iD8DBQFEuwRJFN7pD9kMi/URAsCSAJwMXoPA1fqg5CHkJxbId0OYsCXEcACeKXGc
40 r9FcluQ/XA0fRm8nBzTzmK4=
41 =goWq
42 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
43 --
44 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Compile question Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>