| 1 |
Top-posting is totally fine when emailing from a mobile device. It |
| 2 |
does make it hard to follow a thread, but email's are time-stamped. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On 3/25/09, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
> Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 8 |
>> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:49:57 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>>> I don't mind top posting in private emails but not on the list. Who is |
| 12 |
>>> it with that signature with the backward questions about top posting? |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> This one? |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. |
| 18 |
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| 19 |
>> A: Top-posting. |
| 20 |
>> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> or this one? |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> Q: Why is top-posting evil? |
| 25 |
>> A: backwards read don't humans because |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> Both have been in my tagfile for years. |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> The top one is the one I was thinking about. Funny thing is, it took me |
| 33 |
> a couple reads the first time to figure out it was backwards. It really |
| 34 |
> didn't make much sense. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> I do like the last one tho. That was cute. ;-) |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Dale |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> :-) :-) |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
Sent from my mobile device |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
James Skinner |
| 48 |
james.skinner@×××××.com |
Archives