| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 07 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 07/08/13 05:25, gottlieb@×××.edu wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Tue, Aug 06 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> that's only because gnome 3.8 hasn't been stabilized yet. as in, there |
| 7 |
>>> are no plans in keeping gnome 2.x available after gnome 3.8 |
| 8 |
>>> stabilization. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Am I correct in believing that gnome-3.8 (whether in testing as now, or |
| 11 |
>> stable later) requires init=systemd? I am converting an old ~amd64 |
| 12 |
>> machine to systemd for practice so that I can convert my main laptop |
| 13 |
>> (also ~amd64) to systemd. The purpose of the conversions is to run |
| 14 |
>> gnome-3.8 and higher. I have other machines running stable. Will I |
| 15 |
>> need to convert them to systemd when gnome-3.8 becomes stable and if so |
| 16 |
>> will the systemd wiki be expanded. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Yes, GNOME 3.8+ does require sys-apps/systemd installed and running as |
| 19 |
> init= for full functionality[1] |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> However if you don't care about full functionality[1] you can still |
| 22 |
> run GNOME 3.8+ with OpenRC while sys-apps/systemd is installed |
| 23 |
> (because sys-apps/systemd has it's own copy of udev that still works |
| 24 |
> with OpenRC) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> [1] HW support, like (auto)mounting and suspend/hibernate |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Thanks for the explanation. Since suspend/resume is important for me, I |
| 29 |
will keep up the effort to go to systemd. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
allan |
Archives