1 |
Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Dominic Kexel wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> That's right, i totaly agree. If you buy a HP-printer, you (almost) can't do something wrong. I am using a HP Deskjet F2180 (40€). Printing and scanning both work without problems. |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 22:00:28 -0800 |
9 |
>>> "Manuel McLure" <manuel@××××××.org> wrote: |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>> I have a HP Deskjet D4260 that I got from newegg for less than $50.00. |
15 |
>> It works very well. Before that I had a little Deskjet 3820 which I had |
16 |
>> for years. It finally lost its head. Turn it on and it just goes from |
17 |
>> side to side until I cut it off. The 4260 also has the option of using |
18 |
>> the hi yield cartridges too. It can print for a long time without |
19 |
>> running out of ink. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> I think if you get a HP printer, you will do all right. I wouldn't get |
22 |
>> the latest thing unless I checked for drivers first tho. Also, to get |
23 |
>> my old 3820 to work, I googled for the ppd file and put it in the right |
24 |
>> place for cups. That was before hplip came out. I don't remember |
25 |
>> having to do that with the 4260. |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> Hope that helps give you some ideas. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> Dale |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Thanks Dale, and everyone who suggests HP. This is probably the best |
34 |
> way to go if he decides to stay with an inexpensive ink-jet. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> I'm intrigued by Albert's suggestion to look for a $400 color laser |
37 |
> printer. It's not a great solution for my house by my Dad's flush so |
38 |
> he might like that sort of solution. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> A question I have about laser printers, from the old days whn I had |
41 |
> one, is aren't they really pretty bad reliability for low print volume |
42 |
> applications. My old laser printer, made by some off-brand company |
43 |
> that was early into the Postscript clone game, was that the rollers |
44 |
> very quickly got flat spots because we didn't print every day. When we |
45 |
> would print the paper wouldn't feed correctly and the quality was bad. |
46 |
> I don't think my Dad is going to print more than 2-3 pages/day on |
47 |
> average and since they travel now and again it could sit idle for a |
48 |
> week or two. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> I suppose I could make some sort of cron job that printed one page a |
51 |
> day if that was a reasonable solution. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Very interested in your ideas and greatful for all the responses. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> Cheers, |
56 |
> Mark |
57 |
> |
58 |
|
59 |
I have a friend that owned a business that was closed on weekends. |
60 |
Every Monday we had to fan the paper and take out the toner cartridge |
61 |
and give it a little shake. I have heard that if it is a humid location |
62 |
that you either have to leave the printer on or print a lot. The claim |
63 |
was the toner would start to clump from the moister in the air. I have |
64 |
never seen that happen myself. |
65 |
|
66 |
That was a long time ago and surely by now they have fixed those |
67 |
"issues". Laser is good but also keep your light bill in mind. They do |
68 |
use a good bit more electricity. |
69 |
|
70 |
Dale |
71 |
|
72 |
:-) :-) |