1 |
On 30/11/14 12:35, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 22:32:18 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Bill Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> wrote: |
4 |
>>> I am already really annoyed that by default |
5 |
>>> systemd and apps designed to work with it leave traces on openrc based |
6 |
>>> systems. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> You're getting worked up about text files and filenames. I suppose |
9 |
>> you'll be really upset that bash completion files are now being |
10 |
>> installed by default, and packages install logrotate configs and cron |
11 |
>> scripts even if you don't use logrotate or cron. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> We have INSTALL_MASK for such cases. While it should be used with |
14 |
> care (as improper use will broke system), INSTALL_MASK="*/systemd/*" |
15 |
> keeps my systems clean from this filthy abomination. |
16 |
> |
17 |
>> Sure, we could add a million more layers of conditionals to everything |
18 |
>> and you might save a few dozen inodes on your 10GB install, at the |
19 |
>> cost of lots of hassle/bugs/etc. In general Gentoo tends to take the |
20 |
>> pragmatic approach. If you're a purist of just about any kind you're |
21 |
>> going to have to hold your nose. However, this cuts both ways - the |
22 |
>> purists who don't want YOU to be able to make the choices YOU want to |
23 |
>> make also have to hold their noses. :) |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Best regards, |
26 |
> Andrew Savchenko |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
Yes I am using install masking ... but I believe there was a comment |
30 |
that this could break things as some programs expected to see the files |
31 |
in the systemd directories. Hence my comment. |
32 |
|
33 |
And about being a purist and holding my nose ... no I am not ... but I |
34 |
do not like useless cruft just because it was the easy way out which was |
35 |
my impression of the conversation on the email list - hence INSTASL_MASLK. |
36 |
|
37 |
BillK |