1 |
On 19/12/2016 11:45, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
> J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote : |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Sunday, December 18, 2016 03:11:58 PM Peter Humphrey wrote: |
5 |
>>> Peter Humphrey peter@××××××××××××.uk> |
6 |
>> wrote : |
7 |
>>>> This morning I ran my usual daily update and was presented with a long |
8 |
>>>> list of kde-app packages, including KMail-2. The only problem was four |
9 |
>>>> blocks that portage couldn't sort out on its own, so I evicted the |
10 |
>>>> existing versions with emerge -C and continued. |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>>> Then kleopatra failed to build, as in bug 602924. The fix there worked |
13 |
>> (I |
14 |
>>>> should call it an evasion really) and kleopatra built ok. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> I should have done some more checking before writing. The fix was to |
17 |
>> emerge |
18 |
>>> -C kde-apps/gpgmepp. I don't know whether you can do that before starting |
19 |
>>> the upgrade, but it's worth a try. It might save a lot of work. |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>>> At any rate, there's no sign of gpgmepp being pulled back in with the new |
22 |
>>> 16.12.0 versions of kde-apps packages, now that the old versions have |
23 |
>> gone. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> More important, how is the latest kmail behaving? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> It isn't. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I finished the emerge -e world, then @preserved-rebuild presented me with a whole lot of packages, resulting in the same appalling mess as before: incompatible versions being required of numerous packages. I've never had @preserved-rebuild follow an -e world before. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I've reverted to a week-old system backup, but now when I invoke KMail I get a dialogue box saying "This will start the program kmail -qwindowtitle %c %u. If you do not trust this program, click Cancel". What? Of course I trust it, so I click Continue, and I get "Unable to make the service KMail executable, aborting execution" |
32 |
> |
33 |
> What could possible go wrong with a simple offline tarring of files to USB disk and back again? I know, I know... |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Has no-one else tried this upgrade? |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
Not KMail, it stopped using that since years ago. |
40 |
|
41 |
But I do notice that a bucket load of new KDE-5 packages are hitting the |
42 |
tree, and despite having SLOTS 4 and 5, some of those packages are |
43 |
incompatible, such as audiocd-kio. I'm stuck on SLOT 4 for the time |
44 |
being as amarok is still codes for KDE-4 libs (unless there's a 5 |
45 |
version in some overlay). |
46 |
|
47 |
This is all ~arch, so we are the ones who get to file the bug reports. |
48 |
I advise just work through the blockers till the latest batch of |
49 |
versions settle down and are all done. |
50 |
|
51 |
As for your executable problem, what are the owners/perms of the |
52 |
relevant file? |
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
Alan McKinnon |
57 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |