Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Ramifications of memtest86. Got it!
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:04:10
Message-Id: hl4c5n$9jd$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Ramifications of memtest86. Got it! by Alan Mackenzie
1 On 02/12/2010 09:25 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
2 > Hi, Dale,
3 >
4 > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:01AM -0600, Dale wrote:
5 >
6 >> Where the error is could depend on a single transistor that is maybe
7 >> not as sensitive as the others. It's sort of like a chain. It's only
8 >> as strong as its weakest link. It could be that whatever is going
9 >> wrong could be right on the edge of others not working either. The
10 >> one that is failing is just the first if it is a power problem.
11 >> That's where the power problem thought comes from. Have you had a
12 >> look here for well tested power supplies?
13 >
14 >> That said, it could be a lot of things. It could be a bad chip on the
15 >> mobo, a piece of dust in the wrong place or any number of other things.
16 >> It's finding it that is so much fun.
17 >
18 > The shop who sold me the components suggested running memtest86 with
19 > just one RAM stick at a time.
20
21 The correct procedure is to test just one stick in at least two
22 different slots. This is to ensure that it's not the mainboard at fault
23 (like a faulty RAM slot.)