| 1 |
2009/2/25 Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:11:38 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > > No, but they are stable, and required for sets as the OP wanted. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > Doesn't look really stable: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > # Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> (05 Jan 2009) |
| 10 |
> > # Portage 2.2 is masked due to known bugs in the |
| 11 |
> > # package sets and preserve-libs features. |
| 12 |
> > >=sys-apps/portage-2.2_pre |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> That depends on the severity of the known bugs, and the likelihood of |
| 15 |
> meeting them. The only real bug I've had is that I had to emerge |
| 16 |
> @preserved-rebuild several times, after one update, before it would go |
| 17 |
> away. A waste of CPU cycles but hardly a stability threat. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> Neil Bothwick |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Top Oxymorons Number 12: Plastic glasses |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I just upgraded to the latatest portage version rc23 or similar. Added the |
| 27 |
set file linked in the KDE 4.x guide in /etc/portage/sets/kde. also unmasked |
| 28 |
all the packes also linked in the same guide I see a set called kde, but |
| 29 |
still i can't install kde because i get blocks and non-existant sets... so |
| 30 |
better i will wait to instll kde and also use the new version of portage. |
Archives