1 |
On 31/12/2015 13:19, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
> Hello list, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I've built a separate system in spare partitions, using the desktop/plasma |
5 |
> profile and the kde overlay, to see how I like it. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I don't. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I won't list all my objections here, but I have attached two screen shots of |
10 |
> KMail: one in the standard qt4 KDE environment and the other in qt5. You can |
11 |
> see how much less compact the qt5 version is, even after I've fiddled at some |
12 |
> length with fonts and qt tweaks, including installing the noto fonts which |
13 |
> you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the qt4. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> My question to the panel is: is this just a temporary stage of development, |
16 |
> or are we going to have to live with it down the years? |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
A lot of what you see there is not Qt itself, but the theme. |
20 |
|
21 |
The modern trend in gui elements is to make them less busy, use more |
22 |
whitespace and try to display on thing on the screen at a time (less for |
23 |
the user to focus on). You can see this for yourself: look at typical |
24 |
web sites over the last 15 years, then compare how gui elements are done |
25 |
in kde3, 4 and now 5. You will see a pattern. It's also in OSes and |
26 |
toolkits: gnome, macs, windows since 8. And on your tablets and phone. |
27 |
|
28 |
The Qt5 theme you are looking at reflects this general trend. |
29 |
|
30 |
I have not found a Qt5 theme that looks Qt4-esque, but it's totally |
31 |
possible to do it. |
32 |
|
33 |
I think in your case, you should go back to Qt4 until a quality theme is |
34 |
available for Qt5 that you like. Do keep in mind that Qt4 is already a |
35 |
good distance down the end-of-life process so you will have to switch to |
36 |
Qt5 some time (but not today or tomorrow) |
37 |
-- |
38 |
Alan McKinnon |
39 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |