Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: is ddrescue this slow? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:23:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100109092306.2d865f01@digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: is ddrescue this slow? by Valmor de Almeida |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:20:18 +0000, Valmor de Almeida wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Sometimes the "current rate" reads 0 B/s for a long time... and "time |
| 4 | > from last successful read" can be 8m. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Would any one know whether this is normal? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Doesn't ddrescue retry on blocks it cannot read? That would explain the |
| 9 | variable read rate, even the period of zero activity. If your drive is |
| 10 | that badly damaged, dd would have been no use anyway. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Neil Bothwick |
| 15 | |
| 16 | There's too much blood in my caffeine system. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: is ddrescue this slow? | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> |
| [gentoo-user] Re: is ddrescue this slow? | Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> |