1 |
On Dec 18, 2012 6:33 AM, "Marc Joliet" <marcec@×××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Am Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:04:46 -0800 |
4 |
> schrieb Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> [...] |
7 |
> > > XMPP clients are a dime a dozen, take you pick: pidgin, kopete, |
8 |
> > > telepathy and a hots of others. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > Servers are another story. All of them that you can lay your hands on |
11 |
> > > seem to suck big eggs big time. ejabberd is the only one I found |
12 |
> > > stable enough to actually stay up for sane amounts of time, and not |
13 |
> > > DEPEND on java. |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > But that info might be well out of date, I haven't looked at our |
16 |
> > > jabber server for ages. There's no need to - the techies all |
17 |
> > > gravitated by themselves over to GTalk and Skype, claiming that the |
18 |
> > > cloud services did everything they needed and more, and it was there, |
19 |
> > > and it worked. Our in-house jabber server - not so much. |
20 |
> > > |
21 |
> > > Can't say I blame them. It's true. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > Thanks Alan, this is just the kind of info I need. It sounds like I |
24 |
would |
25 |
> > be better off with a cloud solution for collaborative chat. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Just out of curiosity: why couldn't you use a Jabber client with |
28 |
> Bonjour/Zeroconf support (all or most of them?) within the company (which |
29 |
is |
30 |
> what this is for IIUC)? With Zeroconf, the Jabber clients "find each |
31 |
other", |
32 |
> then you wouldn't need to bother with setting up a server. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Or is Zeroconf problematic? I know Pidgin can do Zeroconf on Windows, |
35 |
even if |
36 |
> you need to manually install a separate package for it to work. |
37 |
|
38 |
That only works within the same mdns domain, which usually means being on |
39 |
the same Ethernet segment. |
40 |
|
41 |
> |
42 |
> -- |
43 |
> Marc Joliet |
44 |
> -- |
45 |
> "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know |
46 |
we |
47 |
> don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |