Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Allan Spagnol Comar <allan.comar@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ldap vs. pam
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:54:03
Message-Id: 1cc2dc830601130945m45a3f1e1n2c0e6427a67fd9b6@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] ldap vs. pam by John Jolet
1 thanks. I believe I am starting to understand this.
2
3 I was seeing that ldap can authenticate in a lot of types, like ,
4 databases, files, and PAM do some things like that too.... or am I
5 wrong ?
6
7 On 1/13/06, John Jolet <john@×××××.net> wrote:
8 >
9 > On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
10 >
11 > > Hi, I don´t know if this is a valid question, or I am making a big
12 > > mess, but I was wondering witch autentication method is better, ldap
13 > > or pam. I would like to know too if is possible to use bouth.
14 > >
15 > ldap is one of the methods that can (p)lug in to pam (pluggable
16 > authentication method...)
17 >
18 > > thanks.
19 > > --
20 > > An application asked:
21 > > "Requeires Windows 9x, NT4 or better",
22 > > so I´ve installed Linux
23 > >
24 > > --
25 > > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
26 > >
27 >
28 >
29 > --
30 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
31 >
32 >
33
34
35 --
36 An application asked:
37 "Requeires Windows 9x, NT4 or better",
38 so I´ve installed Linux
39
40 --
41 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] ldap vs. pam Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] ldap vs. pam John Jolet <john@×××××.net>