Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:43:09
Message-Id: 20120420004125.6350d02e@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning by walt
1 On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:39:25 -0700, walt wrote:
2
3 > > That would have failed on su. It works because I have key
4 > > authentication for SSH. Otherwise I'd have been screwed.
5 >
6 > That seems like a (possibly) helpful clue. When you downgraded,
7 > did you do etc-update again, or were you asked to? Did you run
8 > it after the original upgrade?
9
10 No, no and no.
11
12 > I see that almost all of /etc/pam.d/* have today's date on them,
13 > the only exceptions being samba, sshd, imap, sudo, polkit-1, and
14 > start-stop-daemon.
15
16 Same here, and some of them have moved between the two packages.
17
18
19 --
20 Neil Bothwick
21
22 An unemployed Court Jester is nobody's fool.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning walt <w41ter@×××××.com>