Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: walt <w41ter@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:14:48
Message-Id: jmq9m9$6rq$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning by Neil Bothwick
1 On 04/19/2012 04:41 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
2 > On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:39:25 -0700, walt wrote:
3 >
4 >>> That would have failed on su. It works because I have key
5 >>> authentication for SSH. Otherwise I'd have been screwed.
6 >>
7 >> That seems like a (possibly) helpful clue. When you downgraded,
8 >> did you do etc-update again, or were you asked to? Did you run
9 >> it after the original upgrade?
10 >
11 > No, no and no.
12
13 Just to confirm, are you saying that you did *not* run etc-update
14 after the original upgrade? I remember clearly from this morning
15 that etc-update asked me to replace some files in /etc/pam.d, and
16 I said yes to all. (I don't understand pam well enough to disobey
17 orders ;)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning Hinnerk van Bruinehsen <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>