Archives
Archives
| From: | Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] mysqld invoked oom-killer | ||
| Date: | Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:29:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAN0CFw1f+MLzU2LmghNk54ys0GfXoHTK7=n6gDipbMdWhV4ijg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] mysqld invoked oom-killer by Paul Hartman |
||
| 1 | >> Thanks Paul. I'm leaning toward leaving swap disabled. So I'm sure I |
| 2 | >> have the concept right, is adding a 1GB swap partition functionally |
| 3 | >> identical to adding 1GB RAM with regard to the potential for |
| 4 | >> out-of-memory conditions? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Yep. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | It sounds like adding physical RAM is better than enabling swap in |
| 9 | every way. I'll stay in the anti-swap camp. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | - Grant |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] mysqld invoked oom-killer | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] mysqld invoked oom-killer | Albert Hopkins <marduk@×××××××××××.org> |