| 1 |
On 05/04/2010 00:12, Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 2 |
> 1) If you don't specify metadata then you get the newest - I think |
| 3 |
> that's currently ver. 1.2 or something. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Interesting. I suppose that might be a change in mdadm-3.0 (a version |
| 6 |
which I have yet to use to create any new arrays). However, that would |
| 7 |
contradict the man page which still says: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
"0, 0.90, default" |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> 2) I tried 1.0 this morning (shown below) which didn't fix it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Right. Any version above in the 1 series (1, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2) will not |
| 14 |
work. I'm certain that reverting to the original format is going to |
| 15 |
resolve the issue and that we've just been barking up the wrong tree(s) |
| 16 |
hitherto. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
--Kerin |
Archives