1 |
On Wednesday 15 Aug 2012 17:42:02 Paul Hartman wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:33 PM, J.Marcos Sitorus <gkjdsh@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > Hi guys, after quick read about ssd, I have a couple of question: |
4 |
> > 1. My friend have new server with a ssd installed. He plan to RHEL 5.7 |
5 |
> > (I don't know why he choose this) on it. On redhat website, it say |
6 |
> > something like this: |
7 |
> > "However, if the device does not export topology information, Red Hat |
8 |
> > recommends that the first partition be created at a 1MB boundary." |
9 |
> > What does it mean by 1MB boundary? Does it mean he have to create 1MB |
10 |
> > free space in front or he have to create a 1MB partition in front of |
11 |
> > his actual partition(s)? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> When you run fdisk and it asks starting sector, choose one that has |
14 |
> 1MB of free space in front of it. Flash memory, like magnetic disks, |
15 |
> writes and erases in blocks, so improper alignment can cause multiple |
16 |
> read/writes to happen when only one should have been necessary. Most |
17 |
> flash-based memory has erase blocks with multiples of 4MB so I always |
18 |
> begin the partition at 4MB to be safe. Magnetic disks have much |
19 |
> smaller blocks so 1MB is the usual recommendation for those (since 1MB |
20 |
> is safely divisible by 64k/32k/16k/8k/512b etc.) though if you know |
21 |
> the actual block size on your disk you can go smaller than 1MB. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> > 2. Is it possible to combine TRIM support and ext3 partition (AFAIK, |
24 |
> > RHEL 5.7 haven't support ext4)? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Basically no. Depending on kernel & everything else version there |
27 |
> might be offline trim support ioctl, but not automatic. Don't know |
28 |
> anything about RHEL but maybe xfs supported TRIM in that version. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> > *i hope this is not count as hijacking |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Don't know if it is hijacking, but it is not an RHEL list, and |
33 |
> top-posting can get an angry mob started. :) |
34 |
|
35 |
Grrrrr! :@ |
36 |
|
37 |
LOL! |
38 |
|
39 |
Anyway, I am told that Gparted now adds a 1M unallocated space before a |
40 |
partition is created (and shows it too) as long as one leaves the default |
41 |
alignment option of 'MiB', rather than 'cylinders'. |
42 |
|
43 |
I'm not sure what it does if you select cylinders. May still create it, but I |
44 |
seem to recall that older versions of Gparted did not show unallocated space |
45 |
less than 8M. |
46 |
|
47 |
I think that current versions of fdisk also provide a 1M boundary, or is it |
48 |
4M? Someone more up to speed on this can comment. |
49 |
-- |
50 |
Regards, |
51 |
Mick |