1 |
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:33 PM, J.Marcos Sitorus <gkjdsh@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Hi guys, after quick read about ssd, I have a couple of question: |
3 |
> 1. My friend have new server with a ssd installed. He plan to RHEL 5.7 |
4 |
> (I don't know why he choose this) on it. On redhat website, it say |
5 |
> something like this: |
6 |
> "However, if the device does not export topology information, Red Hat |
7 |
> recommends that the first partition be created at a 1MB boundary." |
8 |
> What does it mean by 1MB boundary? Does it mean he have to create 1MB |
9 |
> free space in front or he have to create a 1MB partition in front of |
10 |
> his actual partition(s)? |
11 |
|
12 |
When you run fdisk and it asks starting sector, choose one that has |
13 |
1MB of free space in front of it. Flash memory, like magnetic disks, |
14 |
writes and erases in blocks, so improper alignment can cause multiple |
15 |
read/writes to happen when only one should have been necessary. Most |
16 |
flash-based memory has erase blocks with multiples of 4MB so I always |
17 |
begin the partition at 4MB to be safe. Magnetic disks have much |
18 |
smaller blocks so 1MB is the usual recommendation for those (since 1MB |
19 |
is safely divisible by 64k/32k/16k/8k/512b etc.) though if you know |
20 |
the actual block size on your disk you can go smaller than 1MB. |
21 |
|
22 |
> 2. Is it possible to combine TRIM support and ext3 partition (AFAIK, |
23 |
> RHEL 5.7 haven't support ext4)? |
24 |
|
25 |
Basically no. Depending on kernel & everything else version there |
26 |
might be offline trim support ioctl, but not automatic. Don't know |
27 |
anything about RHEL but maybe xfs supported TRIM in that version. |
28 |
|
29 |
> *i hope this is not count as hijacking |
30 |
|
31 |
Don't know if it is hijacking, but it is not an RHEL list, and |
32 |
top-posting can get an angry mob started. :) |