1 |
Hi João! |
2 |
|
3 |
Seems to be that the bulldozer and FX architecture is from GCC 4.6.3 up |
4 |
fully supported. |
5 |
|
6 |
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags/AMD#FX-8xxx.2F6xxx.2F4xxx_.28Bulldozer.29 |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
Tamer |
11 |
|
12 |
Am 15.04.2013 16:47, schrieb João Matos: |
13 |
> Great discussion. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I'm in a similar situation. I'm using a core2duo for about 5 years, and |
16 |
> I think it is time to upgrade it. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> But, after reading this, there are still to doubts: |
19 |
> |
20 |
> 1) r the amd processors really fully supported? When I compile my kernel |
21 |
> (amd64), for instance, while looking for "Processor Type" there are 3 |
22 |
> options for Intel and just one for AMD. Wouldn't it be kinda generic? |
23 |
> |
24 |
> 2) durability: I'm kinda traumatized with AMD. Maybe I didn't have luck, |
25 |
> or Brazil is just too hot, but before I change to Intel, I had to buy a |
26 |
> computer a year: mobo problem, socket changed, then replace everything. |
27 |
> I'm very exited with the AMD advantages discussed here, but If it is to |
28 |
> last a year, I'm out. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Back then, when I used amd, I liked the performace and the price very |
31 |
> much. I found out about and came to |
32 |
> Gentoo just when I was looking for a optimized distro to my brand new |
33 |
> athlon64 processor - that lasted a year. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Thank you, |
36 |
> -- |
37 |
> João de Matos |
38 |
> Linux User #461527 |
39 |
> Graduado em Engenharia de Computação |
40 |
> UEFS - Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana |