1 |
Personally, If I think I'm helping someone, I don't care if they top or |
2 |
bottom post or post like you did below, middle posting I guess. I |
3 |
certainly won't care if someone is helping me. |
4 |
|
5 |
The one thing that confuses me is keeping up with who is who. I'm awful |
6 |
at names. I have to work at it to get my girlfriends name right. I |
7 |
actually have it plastered on my monitor to remind me. Just to be safe, |
8 |
I call her Sweety. Don't get me wrong though, I love her dearly but I |
9 |
suck at names. I'm good at remembering faces though. I may not know |
10 |
their name but I know I know them. Confusing huh? |
11 |
|
12 |
If someone wants me to reply on the bottom, say so, I'll scroll down and |
13 |
type away. I'm not sweating this at all. I find it sort of funny |
14 |
really. All this over where to type. LOL, for those text users. :-D |
15 |
for those HTML users. |
16 |
|
17 |
Dale |
18 |
ROTFLMAO!!! |
19 |
|
20 |
Ryan Viljoen wrote: |
21 |
|
22 |
>On 10/30/05, Qian Qiao <qian.qiao@×××××.com> wrote: |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
>>Ok, i top post, just for you, :) |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> |
28 |
> |
29 |
>You can post how you like. Please dont change your ways on my accord. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
>>Imagine someone who wasn't following the thread need to do to pick up this |
34 |
>>thread: |
35 |
>>1. Scroll all the way to the bottom, read Ted's message. |
36 |
>>2. Scroll a bit upwards, to read you message |
37 |
>>3. Then scroll all the way to the top, to read mine. |
38 |
>> |
39 |
>>I can hardly say it is *logical* to read a thread backwards. Another |
40 |
>>example: try to name one forum/BBS system that displays the newest reply on |
41 |
>>the top when viewing a thread. |
42 |
>> |
43 |
>>BTW, how did you like my HTML? I bet you enjoyed it. |
44 |
>> |
45 |
>> |
46 |
> |
47 |
>Um did you not read my previous message? Obviously not, mate... I |
48 |
>agree with you on the HTML, gmail enabled it by default. I disabled it |
49 |
>after you pointed it out, so thank you. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> |
52 |
> |
53 |
> |
54 |
>>You just don't understand that most people dislike top-posting and HTML |
55 |
>>messages for a reason. You've got every right to use whatever you wish in |
56 |
>>your personal mails, but this is a public list, try to be considerate mate. |
57 |
>> |
58 |
>> |
59 |
> |
60 |
>Quite honestly top, middle or bottom posting all seems indifferent to |
61 |
>me. Correct me if I am wrong here but I thought the information was |
62 |
>the important part of the message not whether it is located at the top |
63 |
>or at the bottom? Hmmm guess I was wrong, I now be more considerate |
64 |
>and concern myself with the layout of my messages rather then helping |
65 |
>people. |
66 |
> |
67 |
>In the interests of keeping you happy and god forbid all other people |
68 |
>who are more concerned with layout happy I will cease my evil ways of |
69 |
>top posting. |
70 |
> |
71 |
>Rav |
72 |
> |
73 |
>-- |
74 |
>"When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people just |
75 |
>stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, for |
76 |
>free". - Linus Torvalds, 1995 |
77 |
> |
78 |
> |
79 |
> |