1 |
On 2/14/21 4:42 AM, Michael wrote: |
2 |
> You are probably right. My knowledge of MSWindows environments has |
3 |
> been on a need to know basis, when I can't avoid it. ;-) |
4 |
|
5 |
Fair enough. |
6 |
|
7 |
I've managed to avoid more Windows in the last 10 years than I could in |
8 |
the previous 10 years. |
9 |
|
10 |
> Active Directory Domain Services use port 445 to store and communicate |
11 |
> domain names, IP addresses, list of services available, etc. for |
12 |
> a domain. |
13 |
|
14 |
TCP port 445 is not directly related to AD DS. Sure, AD DS /uses/ TCP |
15 |
port 445, but so do computers that are not participating in AD DS. |
16 |
|
17 |
TCP port 445 is the port that SMB runs over natively. Historically, SMB |
18 |
would use TCP ports 137, 138, and 139 when it was still using the |
19 |
NetBIOS over TCP (NBT). |
20 |
|
21 |
> I suppose initial name to IP resolution happens over port 53, or UDP |
22 |
> 5355 if there is no local DNS resolver configured and the MSWindows |
23 |
> setup uses LLMNR. Microsoft- ds listens on TCP 445 and communicates |
24 |
> stored DNS information to clients regarding domain names, domain |
25 |
> controller(s) and services. I don't know to what extent microsoft-ds |
26 |
> is integrated with the basic TCP-IP DNS service, but expect there |
27 |
> would be some logical linkage in there. |
28 |
|
29 |
I do not recall seeing anything about name resolution running over TCP |
30 |
port 445. |
31 |
|
32 |
... |
33 |
|
34 |
Even the venerable WINS (NetBIOS Name Service) ran over TCP port 137. |
35 |
|
36 |
If you have any authoritative information that you can point to where |
37 |
name resolution, of any type, runs over TCP port 445, please share it as |
38 |
I'd like to read it. |
39 |
|
40 |
> Anyhow, I think the OPs problem is down to the wrong CUPS driver used |
41 |
> in remote client(s). |
42 |
|
43 |
Agreed. |
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
Grant. . . . |
49 |
unix || die |